Best Australian Eco-Friendly, Carbon-Neutral, Sustainability and Environment Resource!

Forums \ Energy \ Right to sunlight - shading of solar collectors

shaded
Kudos: 31
I am writing to offer a word of caution to people

contemplating the installation of solar electric panels or

solar hot water systems in relation to the right to sunlight.

My recent experience concerning DA- 94 / 2010 - Development

Application with Hornsby Concil suggests that little

protection exists to prevent shadowing by adjacent buildings

on such solar collectors.

In persuit of my desire for a sustainable dwelling I attended

Hornsby council workshops regarding the installation of solar

electric grid connect systems and obtained a grant from the

Federal government to install such a system. It now appears

that having invested a considerable amount of my own money

(as well as Federal Government funding), I find that

shadowing from the recently approved DA will adversely impact

the performance of my new system during the winter months.

This combind with the impact on the existing passive solar

design of my dwelling sets me back with respect to my goal of

achieving a lower carbon footprint. As far as I am aware I

have little recourse against this approved application. It

appears that although all levels of government encourage

sustainable energy, no legislation exists to protect against

shadowing of solar collectors.
12/04/2010
Sydney
dextercath
Kudos: 8
Hello shaded,

Yes I agree that no protection existing in solar power, specially in solar power generator. Read www.sunpowerport.com. Can I know your opinion about it? Thank you.

15/04/2010
philippines
shaded
Kudos: 31
Right to sunlight – I have a follow up with my dealings with Hornsby council in relation to a recent DA that will block my solar access. In my letter of objection to council I highlighted the impact on my passive design of my house as well as on the installed solar panels on my roof. I provided detailed drawings showing the passive solar design noting sun angles and the impact of the proposed development on the all important winter sun. I explained to council that as with passive solar design principles the intention is to capture the low angle winter sun for solar heating and screen the high elevation summer sun. In councils report they wrote in justification of allowing additional shading by the new building "Overshadowing already occurs of the ....north facing windows to the living areas of the adjoining property to the south, .....as a result of a ....1.7m wide awning adjoining the northern side of the dwelling-house". When I subsequently questioned council about this statement (1.7m wide awning adjoining the northern side of the dwelling-house) they confirmed that they were referring to my veranda that forms the passive solar design of my house. Clearly, the whole intention of passive solar design is to block high elevation sun angles through summer to keep the house cool.
I have no right of reply and have to accept this statement from council as one reason for allowing the additional shading. If anyone thought that it was going to be easy adopting a sensible approa
13/05/2010
Sydney
shaded
Kudos: 31
I have an update on my problems with shading of collectors - I received the following response from a local councillor – not the answer anyone in NSW wants to hear. He was sympathetic to my case but said "Now, due to the newly introduced planning laws, it is very difficult to do something like that (have flexibility to impose extra conditions on a DA) as it can be easily challenged by the applicant. The new laws are far more pro development and whether council wants to or not they have to be followed. The new laws now allow someone to bulldoze a house giving two days notice to the neighbour and so long as a number of checkboxes are ticked (and solar access for panels are not one of them) the applicant would have what is called a complying development which would not even need to go through council's DA process. Essentially council now has one hand tied behind its back when dealing with these issues now".
15/06/2010
Sydney
 
To participate in this discussion, please log in or register.
PureGreen Says: